Commentary: Daunte Wright’s Death Is a Tragedy for Us All

Daunte Wright
by Scott McKay


We will never hear the last of these names. Eric Garner. Alton Sterling. Michael Brown. George Floyd. Rashad Brooks.

And now Daunte Wright.

We will never hear the last of them because there will always be more. And because certain people are invested in forcing us to hear about them.

But what they demand we hear isn’t the truth.

Is it a tragedy that Daunte Wright is dead? Of course it is. Should he have been shot dead on Sunday by a Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, police officer? Why, no – he shouldn’t have been.

We can get this out of the way very easily. The Brooklyn Center police department employed, it appears, a female cop who after 26 years on the force can’t tell the difference in a stressful situation between a taser and a Glock pistol. To call this a failure of hiring and training would be a rather generous statement.

There was something of a hue and cry over the firing of the city manager in that Minneapolis suburb because he called for the officer to be given due process, but the fact of the matter is that the most likely result of due process in the Daunte Wright case is firings up the chain of command anyway. The officer in question, Kim Potter, who was a former police union local president,  has already resigned. The police chief, Tim Gannon, has also resigned. Mike Elliott, the African American Democrat mayor of Brooklyn Center, seems pretty intent on throwing under the bus as many underlings as possible in order to save himself, but he probably ought to go, too.

Particularly after what the mob did to Brooklyn Center in response to the Daunte Wright shooting.

We could have an argument about “diversity hiring” here. We could also have an argument, as was insistent on raising Monday, about the deadly stupidity of laws like the one Minnesota has criminalizing the hanging of air fresheners or other items from the rearview mirror of a car. Reason‘s Billy Binion pronounced Daunte Wright dead as a result of that idiotic statute.

He’s wrong. That law, disgracefully ridiculous though it might be, did not kill Daunte Wright.

Daunte Wright, or at least the life he led, killed Daunte Wright.

He wasn’t pulled over because he had air fresheners hanging from his rearview mirror. He was pulled over because he had expired tags on his license plate. Then it was noticed that he had air fresheners hanging from his rear view.

Then it was noticed he had an outstanding warrant.

Then it was noticed he resisted arrest.

Then it was noticed he got back in his car and drove away from the police. Which he had done before, as it turned out; Wright had fled from officers in June. The circumstances from which that police encounter arose make for scintillating reading. He was reported to the police for waving a gun around, and when the cops showed up it turned out Wright didn’t have a permit for the gun.

He ran away. And he was cited and ordered to appear in court. He didn’t, which occasioned the warrant for his arrest.

That’s not all that appears on Wright’s record. There was the February arrest for aggravated robbery. There was a disorderly conduct charge arising from a 2019 incident. There was the guilty plea in late 2019 to possession and sale of marijuana. And there was an arrest warrant for armed robbery; Wright was accused of choke-holding a woman and threatening her at gunpoint, demanding $820 intended to pay her rent.

Daunte Wright dropped out of high school, then fathered a child out of wedlock he couldn’t support with minimum-wage jobs and petty drug dealing. He had borrowed $50 from his parents to take his car to a car wash and had his girlfriend in the car with him, with expired license tags. He was stopped by the police, resisted arrest, and then attempted to drive away — which raised the likelihood that he would expose his girlfriend to bodily harm. She was apparently injured when, as he bled out following being shot by Officer Potter, he crashed the car attempting a getaway.

In other words, this is someone who chose to be a penny-ante John Dillinger. He ended up with the full ante.

His parents are justifiably upset at his death. The loss of a child is one of the most heartbreaking events anyone could bear. Certainly our sympathies go out to them.

But Daunte Wright’s father called him “a great kid.” He said he was “a normal kid. He was never in serious trouble. He enjoyed spending time with his 2-year-old son. He loved his son.”

Great kids don’t fight with and then flee the cops. Great kids don’t bring the police around because they’re waving guns. Great kids aren’t arrested for aggravated robbery or for dealing drugs.

Or, in the community Daunte Wright came from, maybe they do. Maybe that’s great.

If so, that’s a lot bigger problem than the incompetence of the politicians and police in Brooklyn Center, Minnesota.

But that isn’t something you’ll hear much about, is it?

You aren’t even allowed to talk about the fact that this 20-year-old kid had already messed up his life and may have been well on his way to becoming a career criminal. Daunte Wright had perpetuated the cycle of out-of-wedlock childbirth, academic failure, the inability to learn and deploy a marketable skill, and escalating criminal behavior that so horrifically afflicts the black community in this country.

If Daunte Wright’s life was “great” and not substandard, then we will never be rid of these tragedies. And they’re all fundamentally the same — career criminal on the fringe of society, a failure in life, involved in drugs (if not high at the time; we’ll know later what the toxicology report shows), likely faced with prolonged jail time upon arrest and resisting arrest.

How do you prevent deaths like Daunte Wright’s? You try to prevent young men from living lives like Daunte Wright’s.

But you aren’t allowed to say that. Neither Joe Biden nor Kamala Harris, both of whom had the opportunity to lead but instead chose to pander to the mob, would say it. Nor would Minnesota’s Gov. Tim Walz, another pandering Democrat responsible for more of his state’s destruction than perhaps all of his predecessors combined.

Wright’s family hired — of course! — the race-hustling attorney Ben Crump, who has made his entire livelihood trying cases like this in the media as the cities where they happen burn. Crump’s street-criminal clients, or more specifically their families, often pull nice settlements out of local governments despite weak evidence of actual malfeasance.

This case, owing to the Barney Fife nature of the gunplay involved, might be Ben Crump’s best yet. Which isn’t saying much.

So he was on the scene in Brooklyn Center almost before the body was cold.

“Daunte Wright’s life matters,” Crump said.

Well, of course it matters. It matters to Ben Crump. Daunte Wright will be a nice paycheck for him. And so will the next Daunte Wright, and the one after that. Before too long, Ben Crump will be able to buy a million-dollar house in Topanga Canyon near Black Lives Matter founder Patrisse Cullors’ fresh crib.

It isn’t a coincidence that nobody is interested in preventing lives like Daunte Wright’s but rather celebrating them. Daunte Wright’s funeral will be a lot bigger deal than David Dorn’s. There will be murals painted and stores burned and looted in his honor.

And then there will be a fat settlement. Daunte Wright will end up worth a whole lot more dead than he ever was alive.

So long as this tragic cycle can’t be called out for the horrific farce that it is, it will continue. But it can’t. And the next Daunte Wright will only keep the wheel turning around and around.

– – –

Scott McKay is publisher of the Hayride, which offers news and commentary on Louisiana and national politics. He’s also a novelist — check out his first book “Animus: A Tale of Ardenia,” available in Kindle and paperback.
Photo “Daunte Wright Poster” by Andrew Ratto. CC BY 2.0.










Appeared at and reprinted from The American Spectator


Related posts

7 Thoughts to “Commentary: Daunte Wright’s Death Is a Tragedy for Us All”

  1. Ms Independent

    When a police officer tells you to stop – then stop. These men refused to stop. The outcome is their own fault. They had prior criminal records. These were no angels and chose to resist arrest.

    1. Richard Donnell

      So according to your logic, since they didn’t stop or refused to stop; since the outcome is their own fault; since they had criminal records; and since they were no angels and chose to resist arrest; the police officers were justified in killing these unarmed men! Is that correct?

      1. M. Flatt

        There is a high probability that had these thugs not escalated the situation, they would still be alive today. If you don’t give a good cop a reason to pull a gun, you’re very unlikely to be shot.
        As much as the likes of Crump and Company would have you believe otherwise, most policemen are not black-hating trigger-happy monsters.

      2. Bill

        Pretty much yes. Otherwise let’s just do whatever we want to and not have any consequence to any behavior we decide, whether its stealing , raping, killing etc. Let’s just have a free for all and call it social justice . Your world is a twisted one with no justifiable outcome.

      3. snuffy

        No one is saying it was justified, but neither was it unexpected, given the decedents history and actions leading up to him being shot. If you don’t commit an action that ends up involving the police, then odds are, you won’t end up being shot by one. That said, the female officer should be charged with something, and not being an expert on MN law, I leave that up to the DA. That said, it has to make you wonder what was going through his mind when he decided it was better to run than to comply. I mean, it’s not like they didn’t know who he was, and eventually, he was going to jail. With the left pushing the narrative that blacks are getting killed daily by the racist police, if I was black, and was stopped, I would take no action that they could interpret as hostile. Even a supposedly smart guy like that lieutenant that got pulled over couldn’t figure that out. Maybe the black churches need to hand out cheat sheets and have a weekly quiz on how to behave if stopped.

      4. pigpen51

        So Mr.Donnell, just how would you approach a person who may or may not have in their possession a weapon, and is attempting to get into their vehicle, while you are behind them? Would you ask them nicely, please stop? Would you just gun them down, without attempting to stop the person first?
        Or as is the norm, would you attempt to physically intervene, and stop the person from gain entry to the vehicle, with you at the time not knowing if there is a weapon on the person, or in the vehicle? Would it not be the best method to lean towards the weapon being present, in order to protect both yourself and any partner, civilian and other person present?
        Does that make it correct to just execute randomly anyone that might come across your radar, as a possible drug user, seller, black person, etc?
        That this woman who could not rely upon her own self to decide which tool she had in her hand, a Glock or a Tazer was a law enforcement officer, for what they say is 26 years, rings hollow to me. Just because you are a cop doesn’t really tell you much of anything.
        An unarmed person, who was attempting to injure a police officer, either with their bare hands, or with a rock or a gun, the attempt to injure a police officer is grounds for the officer to escalate the level of violence by the police, in order to overwhelm the alleged criminal. A cop doesn’t have to let the bad guy hurt them before they take action to stop them.